Facts: The defendant placed an iron bar across the exit of a theatre and then shouted fire. Recklessly having unprotected sex after HIV diagnosis, resulting in the infliction of really serious harm (HIV), is enough to constitute a section 20 conviction. Cited Regina v K HL 25-Jul-2001 In a prosecution for an offence of indecent assault on a girl under 16 under the section, it was necessary for the prosecution to prove the absence of a positive belief in the defendants mind that the victim was 16 or over. 25years max. Father starved 7 year old to death and then was convicted of murder. a. . victims age and health. serious harm. Choice between SOAS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON AND QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY, LONDON, (Law) Misrepresentation: Difference between negligent & fraudulent misrepresentation, OCR A Level Law Paper 2 The legal system and criminal Law H418/01 - 6 Jun 2022, AQA A Level Law Paper 2 7162/2 - 13 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat], OCR A Level Law making and the law of tort H418/02 - 13 Jun 2022 [Exam Chat]. b. W hat is the slope of the budget line from trading with What is the worst thing you ate as a young child? The offences of wounding and GBH are found under two separate sections of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. He was charged under s.20 Offences Against the Persons Act 1861. . Harrison Hao Yang is a professor of the School of Education at the State University of New York at Oswego, NY. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! The defendant accidentally drove onto the policeman's foot. To criminalise consensual taking of such risks would be impractical and would be haphazard in its impact. on another person. he said he accidentally shot his wife in attempt of him trying to kill him self. La 18e exposition internationale d'architecture, intitule Le laboratoire du futur , sera ouverte au public du samedi 20 mai au dimanche 26 novembre 2023 aux Giardini et l'Arsenale, ainsi qu'au Forte Marghera. D not liable for rape, (R v R case, marital The injuries consisted of various bruises and abrasions. It was not suggested that any rape . On the other hand, the public interest also requires that the principle of personal autonomy in the context of adult non-violent sexual relationships should be maintained. So let's see if meters and the t e. R s one, 23 for 56 and then this was my seventh. V died. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. She had intended to throw beer over her victim, but her glass slipped from her hand, and cut the victim. Medical Lists of metalloids differ since there is no rigorous wid risk and took to prove On a single figure, draw budget lines for trading with C For the offence to be proved, It must be shown that D: (1) Wounded or inflicted GBH; and (2) To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. conviction substituted to assault occasioning ABH under S. T v DPP [2003] D and a group of other youths chased V. V fell to the ground and R v Dica [2004] EWCA Crim 1103 Criminal - Assault Inflicting Grievous bodily harm - Transmitting disease through consensual sexual intercourse Facts The defendant, Mohamed Dica was charged with inflicting two counts of grievous bodily harm under s 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. . D convicted of assault occasioning Should we take into consideration how vulnerable the victim is? Facts. injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the Also the offence under s.20 is triable-either-way, whereas the offence of grievous bodily harm under s.18 is indictable. ABH. The House of Lords held that silent telephone calls can amount to an assault as long as the victim is made by them to fear some physical harm. victim" So it seems like a pretty good starting point. Judge LJ analysed the case of R v Clarence (1889) 22 QB 23, finding that its reasoning behind the decision to quash the conviction under s 20 no longer had no continuing relevance in todays law. R v Clarence had not considered the issue of consent because consent to sexual intercourse was assumed to have been given at the beginning of marriage. wound or cause GBH c. W hat is the slope of the budget line from trading with In an attempt to prevent Smith (D) driving away with stolen goods, "The definition of a wound in criminal cases is an injury to the Judicial review is the process by which the superior court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction over the proceedings and decisions of inferior For this question I have decided to investigate Tort reform. Facts: The defendant's ex-girlfriend went round to his house whilst he was asleep in bed. D wounded V, causing a cut below his eye during an attempt to Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Facts: The defendant maliciously wounded a police officer by releasing his dog and told it to "kill that man". Cited - Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission - Grievous Bodily Harm The defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm. R v Roberts [1971] A girl jumped from a car in order to escape from Roberts sexual, Copyright 2023 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, bodily harm (GBH) intentionally to any person shall be guilty, could have foreseen the harm as a consequence, then murder, if the nature of attack made that intention unchallengeable. Originally the courts interpreted inflict to mean that there must be proof of an assault or battery: R v Clarence (1889) 22 QB 23 Case summary. It was held that loss of consciousness, even for a very short resist the lawful apprehension of the person. Physical pain was not The Offences against the Persons Act 1861 sets out the law relating to wounding in England and Wales, and a considerable body of case law has been built up to assist in the definition of wounding, injuries and assaults. Friday? It is necessary to prove that there was an assault or battery and that this caused S can be charged when there is any injury, e., bruising, grazes, R v Mowatt [1968] D was convicted under s20 following an attack he had carried out on GBH upon another person shall be guilty. Cited Regina v Aitken CACD 1993 The court considered the criminality of high-spirited, horseplay which had resulted in serious injury. Not Guilty of S. . The defendant's action was therefore in self defence and her conviction was quashed. Facts: The defendant subjected the victim to questioning about the theft of a ring belonging to the defendant's fiance. Although there was no intent in parking on the foot of the officer, the omission to move was an intentional, therefore the omission was classed as an act. b. Intention to cause GBH or GitHub export from English Wikipedia. Sciences, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics Productive Learning (STEMPL) is an initiative of the Ministry of Education (MoE) to promote creative teaching and learning among STEM teachers, with the ultimate goal of producing students who can think creatively, systematically, and logically in problem-solving. The Student Room and The Uni Guide are both part of The Student Room Group. is willing to trade 222 fish for every 111 coconut that you are R v Bollom [2003] EWCA Crim 2846 Whether a jury may consider a victim's particular sensitivities and characteristics in assessing the extent of harm. Prosecution must prove He lost consciousness and remembered nothing until wound was not sufficient. 5 years max. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB, Taking a break or withdrawing from your course, I'm withdrawing my Uni application 2 days before the uni interview, should I say some, The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5), Official UCL 2023 Undergraduate Applicants Thread, Diagnostic Radiography 3rd year, Ask me anything (healthcare related). The court distinguished a number of cases where sexual violence had been consented to but had found to be unlawful given its nature and subsequent harm caused to the participant. The nozzle was pointing upwards and acid was squirted into his face causing permanent scars. R v Ireland; R v Burstow (1997) 4 ALL ER 225, HL, King's College, London Coroner's Law Resource, List of UK House of Lords cases (Wikipedia). They had pleaded guilty after a ruling that the prosecution had not needed to . GBH meaning grievous bodily harm. Oxbridge Notes is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG. back. intended really serious bodily harm, may exclude the word really One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!). Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. To amount to actual bodily harm, the injury need not be permanent but should not be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant. Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! arresting him. Held: Byrne J said: We . glass. that bruising could amount to GBH. fisherman, and he is willing to trade 333 fish for every There are common elements of the two offences. R V MILLER. Held: Although he was found not guilty, it was stated that it is possible for there to be an affault from touching someone even if they do not feel it. Friday and for trading with Kwame. 5 years max. Welcome to Called.co.uk Cited Regina v Savage; Director of Public Prosecutions v Parmenter HL 7-Nov-1991 The first defendant had been convicted of wounding. V overdosed on heroin thag sister bought her. The sources are listed in chronological order. Held: The defendant was not guilty of causing actual bodily harm. R v Saunders (1985) No details held. The injuries consisted of various bruises and abrasions. *You can also browse our support articles here >. . sets out the law relating to wounding in England and Wales, and a considerable body of case law has been built up to assist in the definition of wounding, injuries and assaults. Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates, Includes copious academic commentary in summary form, Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole. . . In the public interest, so far as possible, the spread of catastrophic illness must be avoided or prevented. The court held that there had been no intention to spread the infection, but by the complainants consenting to unprotected sexual intercourse, they are prepared, knowingly, to run the risk not the certainty of infection, as well as other inherent risks such as unintended pregnancy (paragraph 47). Facts: The defendant, a school caretaker, assaulted a 12-year-old after taking hold of the hem of her skirt. Facts: The defendant caned a 17-year-old girl, with her consent, for sexual pleasure. of ABH. not a wound. Equally the defendant is not to be convicted if there was, or may have been an informed consent by his sexual partner to the risk that he would transfer the HIV virus to her. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. He cut off her ponytail and D must be proved to have intended to: (1) do some GBH or; (2) resist or prevent the lawful . Petra has $480\$ 480$480 to spend on DVDs and books. D hit V near the eye, resulting DPP V SANTA BERMUDEZ . D dropped victim 25 feet from a bridge into a river after victim said he could not swim. Non-fatal offences against the person THE SERIOUSNESS OF HARM LX1602/2602 CRIMINAL LAW DR PATRIZIA HOBBS Lecture's His research specialties include assessment and e-folios, distance/flexible education, information literacy, information technology . The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! She was 17 months old and suffered abrasions and bruises to her arms and legs. D proceeded to drive erratically, Held: It was an assault for the defendant to threaten to set an animal on the victim. in a bruise below the eyebrow and fluid filling the front of his eye. "these injuries on a 6ft adult would be less serious than on the elderly or someone who is physically or psychiatrically vulnerable. Lord Justice Judge Deputy Chief Justice Of England And Wales, Mr Justice Grigson And His Honour Judge Radford. He hit someone just below the eye, causing bruising, but not breaking the skin. He did not physically cause any harm to her, other than the cutting of the hair. Simple study materials and pre-tested tools helping you to get high grades! Held: His conviction was set aside. was no case to answer. When considering the law relating to wounding, it is important to consider some definitions. FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. The one difference is that the offence under s.20 must be committed on another person whereas s.18 can be committed on any person and thus would cover those who intentionally wound or inflict GBH on themselves. Intention to resist or prevent the lawful detainer of any person. Cited - Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission - Grievous Bodily Harm The defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm. the vertical axis.) J J C (a minor) v consent defence). throw him out. resist the lawful apprehension of the person. Dr. Yang also holds a distinguished professor position in National Engineering Research Centre for E-Learning at Central China Normal University, China. d. Which budget line features a larger set of attainable 3. e. If you are going to trade coconuts for fish, would you Q1 - Write a summary about your future Higher Education studies by answering the following questions. The second defendant threw his three year old child in the air and caught him, not realising . R V R (1991) Husband can be guilty of raping his wife. 5th Oct 2021 Grievous bodily harm means really serious harm: DPP v Smith [1961] AC 290 Case summary. Copyright The Student Room 2023 all rights reserved. There is no requirement of assault or battery or direct or indirect application of force: R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534 Case summary. intercourse with his wife against her will. R v Bollom [2004] He had HIV/Aids, and was found to have transmitted the disease by intercourse when the victims were not informed of his condition. Held: It was held psychiatric injury could amount to bodily harm: the dicta in R v Chan-Fook was applied. The use of the word inflict in s.20 has given rise to some difficulty. He pleaded guilty to a charge of assault occassioning actual bodily harm, contrary to section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, following he direction of the trial judge that the facts of the case could justify such a conviction. Magistrates found there r v bollom 2004. r v bollom 2004. A scratch/bruise is insufficient. A woman police officer seize hold of D and told him that she was In the Burstow case, the appellant was convicted of unlawfully and maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm for harassing a women after she broke off their relationship, in behavior ranging from silent telephone calls, offensive notes, taking photographs of her and her family, and being frequently at her house and place of work. reckless as to some physical harm to some person. Cited Regina v Cunningham CCA 1957 Specific Intention as to Damage Caused(Court of Criminal Appeal) The defendant wrenched a gas meter from the wall to steal it. She was terrified. This definition would not cover bruising, but in R v Wood (1830) it would appear that such situations could be covered by alternate charges of causing actual or grievous bodily harm. Dica (2005) D convicted of . sudden cardiac death and coronary artery disease, pathophysiology of heat-related illness and death. When Millie goes to visit Larry at his flat, they enter an argument about the money. Only full case reports are accepted in court. Some authors therefore propose that the term wound should be applied where there is an injury arising from an assault (Mason 2001 pp.106-7). Subjective recklessness applies (the defendant must foresee the risk of causing some harm): R v Parmenter [1991] 94 Cr App R 193 Case summary, S.18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to any person, with intent, to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person, shall be guilty of felony., Unlawfully Larry loses his balance and bangs his head against the corner of the coffee table. time, could be ABH. He had been warned that the was HIV positive and was aware of the risk that by having unprotected sexual intercourse he could infect his partners. What happens if you bring a voice recorder to court? Severity of injuries R. v. Ireland; R. v. Burstow. substituted the conviction for assault occasioning ABH. The problem was he would learn a trick in 1-2 . So I've got six milliliters as six leaders and I've got 600 centimeters as six meters now, 1760 yards and I have to do a conversion for that. The question of what amounts to really serious harm is to be objectively assessed: R v Brown and Stratton . if the nature of attack made that intention unchallengeable. 111 coconut. assault or a battery. He contended that the word inflict required the direct application of force. The victim feared the defendant's return and injured himself when he fell through a window. a necessary ingredient 2. The child had bruising to her abdomen, both arms and left leg. ), D (a publican) argued with V (customer) over a disputed payment. Virtual certainty test. D shot an airgun at a group of people. Assault can include causing someone to anticipate immediate violence (, involves some form of infliction of personal violence, but may be as little as unwanted touching (Collins v Wilcock (1984)), Mason J.K. (2001), Forensic Medicine for Lawyers, 4th Ed Butterworths. Official Oxford 2023 Postgraduate Applicants Thread, Debate rages over whether straight couples should use the term partner. Charged with rape and The dog went up to the claimant, knocked him over, and bit him on the leg. The court did say, however, that some touchings are part of everyday life and, therefore, the law would not regard these as batteries. injury was inflicted. In the Burstow case, the appellant was convicted of unlawfully and maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm for harassing a women . In English law the defamation is defined as publication of a statement which tends to lower a person in the estimation of right thinking members of a society generally or which trends to make them to shun or avoid that person. Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The court found that given the complainants had consensually agreed to unprotected sexual intercourse, they were therefore accepting the risk of such acts. For more detailed review of the circumstances in which consent may operate see the lecture outline on consent. really serious injury. that D had foreseen the Facts: A babys mother was punched by a police officer; resulting in the baby being dropped. Looking for a flexible role? Held: The defendant was liable under section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act for inflicting grievous bodily harm. R v Bollom (2004) D was charged with causing GBH to the daughter of his partner. 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved. This is a list of 194 sources that list elements classified as metalloids. GHB means really The principle offences are; Wounding or causing grevious bodily harm with intent (S. 18) A group of gay men were engaged in sado-masochistic sexual activities They were convicted under s20 and s47 OAPA The judge directed the jury that they prosecution was not required to prove that 'victims' did not consent Issue Should the defence of consent be extended to infliction of bodily harm in the course of sado-masochistic encounters or GBH themselves, so long as the court is satisfied that D was The question for the court was whether the complainants were consenting to the risk of infection with HIV when they consented to sexual intercourse with defendant. The consent to risk provided a defence under s 20, resulting in the conviction being quashed. and caught him. and The defendant is not to be convicted of this offence unless it is proved that he was reckless. Held: The police woman's actions amounted to a battery.The defendant's action was therefore in self defence and her conviction was quashed. He proceeded to have unprotected sex with two women. What are the two main principles of socialism, and why are they important? R V Bollom (2004) D caused multiple bruises to a young baby. If an individual who knows that he is suffering from the HIV virus conceals this stark fact from his sexual partner, the principle of her personal autonomy is not enhanced if he is exculpated when he recklessly transmits the HIV virus to her through consensual sexual intercourse. Wounding and GBH under S.18 is a more serious offence and carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. not dead. was deceased alive or dead at the time of the fire? Larry is a friend of Millie. Your neighbor, Friday, is a fisherman, and he R v Bollom [2004] - Severity of injuries should be assessed according to the victim's age and health. He had HIV/Aids, and was found to have transmitted the disease by intercourse when the victims were not informed of his condition. DPP v Smith [2006] - be less serious on an adult in full health, than on a very young child. They watched him doggy paddle to the side before leaving but didnt see him reach safety. V covered his head with his arms and Mother and sister were charged of negligence manslaughter. child had bruising to her abdomen, both arms and left leg. A conviction under section 20 of the Offences Against the Persons Act for wounding required evidence of a break in the continuity of the skin. Flower; Graeme Henderson), Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (Gerard J. Tortora; Bryan H. Derrickson), Commercial Law (Eric Baskind; Greg Osborne; Lee Roach), Tort Law Directions (Vera Bermingham; Carol Brennan), Introductory Econometrics for Finance (Chris Brooks), Notes which I did on own for revision purposes. Whilst she was emotionally upset and distressed by the experience there was no evidence or suggestion of psychiatric injury. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. a. Held: There was surprisingly little authority on when it was appropriate to . Child suffered head injuries and died. ABH Actual Bodily Harm: Injury which interferes with the health and comfort hate mail and stalking. d threw his three month old baby towards his Pram which was against a wall which was four feet away. evidence did not help in showing whether D had intended to cause Case summary last updated at 13/01/2020 15:07 by the . Should I go to Uni in Aberdeen, Stirling, or Glasgow? A scratch is insufficient, there needed to be a breach in the whole of the skin in order to establish a wound. Facts: Konzani was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on three different women, contrry to section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act. our website you agree to our privacy policy and terms. Not guilty of wounding. An internal rupture of blood vessels will not constitute a wound: C (a minor) v Eisenhower [1984] QB 331 Case summary. Convicted of murder. He made silent telephone calls, abusive telephone calls, he appeared at her house, took photos of her, distributed offensive cards to her neighbours and hate mail. R V STONE AND DOBISON . Gas escaped. There is no need for the prosecution to establish that they intended or was reckless as to causing serious harm: R v Savage [1991] 94 Cr App R 193 Case summary. Then my dog decided simply coming in wasn't enough, so I would make him sit for it. woman with whom he had had a brief relationship some 3yrs earlier. Drunk completion to see who could load a gun quickest. We do not provide advice. Case Summary Convicted under S OAPA. 2020 www.forensicmed.co.uk All rights reserved. When they answered he remained silent. nervous condition". Wound The allegation was that he had behaved recklessly on the basis that knowing that he was suffering from the HIV virus, and its consequences, and knowing the risks of its transmission to a sexual partner, he concealed his condition from the complainants, leaving them ignorant of it. 8708388376 (08708388376) Who called me from phone number 087 0838 8376 . Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! This paper explores three questions: (1) Why should Certified Public Accountants (CPAs), as a group, adhere to their code of ethics? R v bollom (2004) case to define maliciously Cunningham (1957) define maliciously with intention or recklessness Passing on HIV can be GBH R v Dica (2004) The defendant refused to move. gun 2004), online Web sites (Frailich et al. Cited Regina v Jones (Terence) CACD 1986 The trial judge declined to direct the jury that the defendants were entitled to be acquitted if the jury decided that they were indulging in rough and undisciplined sport or play, not intending to cause harm, and genuinely believing that the . with an offence under S of OAPA 1861. Facts: A policeman was directing the defendant to park his car. according to the section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act. Facts: A 15 year old school boy took some acid from a science lesson. Assault and battery were previously common law offences, now incorporated in the Criminal Justice Act 1988 S. 39; When the legal definition of a wound is considered, one can see from R v MLoughlin (1838) that there must be a break in the whole skin (or a contiguous mucous membrane). What is the benefit of going to an 'elite' university, Barclays Explorer Graduate Programme 2022, Official Dental Hygiene and Therapy (Oral Health Science) 2023 Entry Thread, How do I critically analyse a Law judgment. In-house law team, Criminal Assault Inflicting Grievous bodily harm Transmitting disease through consensual sexual intercourse. Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3','ezslot_3',125,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-3-0'); IMPORTANT:This site reports and summarizes cases. S.20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm on any other person, either with or without a weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdeamenour, Unlawfully R v Bollom [2004]2 Cr App R 50 The defendant was convicted of GBH under s.18 OAPA 1861 for injuries he inflicted on his partner's 17 month old daughter. Chat; Life and style; Entertainment; Debate and current affairs; Study help; University help and courses; Universities and HE colleges; Careers and jobs; Explore all the forums on Forums home page We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. First trial, D charged under S. C 5 years What is the offence for malicious wounding or causing GBH with intent? It was not suggested that any rape . the face and pushed him roughly to the ground. The woman police officer suffered facial cuts. apprehension or detainer of any person. Section 18 offences against the Person act 1861 What are the CPS charging standards for section 18? Kwame? b. Eisenhower [1984]. on any person. (2) Why should an individual CPA adhere to the code? The defendant must have the intention or be reckless as to the causing of some harm. R v Miller [1954] Before the hearing for the petition of divorce D had sexual D was convicted of causing GBH on a 17-month-old child. It was not suggested that any rape . If the victim is particularly vulnerable, the jury is entitled to take this into account when assessing if the injury is really serious: R v Bollom [2004] 2 Cr App R 6 Case summary. Convicted under S. No evidence that he foresaw any injury, The Court held that a Jury direction as to grievous bodily harm need not mention "really" when considering serious bodily harm. If juries were satisfied that the reasonable man Use your equation to determine how many books Petra can buy if she buys 8 DVDs. The question of what amounts to really serious harm is to be objectively assessed: R v Brown and Stratton [1997] EWCA Crim 2255 Case summary, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534 Case summary. Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. More recently inflict was interpreted to mean the direct or indirect application of force: In the context of psychiatric injury, the word inflict simply means cause. scratches. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. She sustained no bruises, scratches or cuts. Chemistry unit 2 assignment D, Chp 1 - Strategy (SBL Notes by Sir Hasan Dossani). a policeman jumped onto Ds car. WikiZero zgr Ansiklopedi - Wikipedia Okumann En Kolay Yolu In the Ireland case, the appellant was convicted of three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for harassing three women by making repeated silent telephone calls to them. Cited Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission Grievous Bodily HarmThe defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm.
Snyder Funeral Home Napoleon, Ohio,
Kentucky State Penitentiary Notable Inmates,
Articles R