ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

(I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). @steve6375 Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Both are good. However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : Expect working results in 3 months maximum. "No bootfile found for UEFI! Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. The problem of manjaro-kde-20.0-pre1-stable-staging-200406-linux56.iso in UEFI booting was an issue in ISO file , resolved on latest released ISO today : @FadeMind You signed in with another tab or window. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. backbox-7-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.47 GB, emmabuntus-de3-amd64-10.3-1.01.iso - 3.37 GB, pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2019.2.iso - 4 GB Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Level 1. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . Not exactly. @ventoy Already have an account? Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Please test and tell your opinion. There are two bugs in Ventoy: Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). size: 589 (617756672 byte) Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Also ZFS is really good. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Ventoy Forums Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. 5. extservice The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. Download Debian net installer. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Supported / Unsupported ISOs Issue #7 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT privacy statement. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. You signed in with another tab or window. Ventoy I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. VMware or VirtualBox) Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. its okay. Any suggestions, bugs? Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. No! Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation accomodate this. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. Ventoy download | SourceForge.net Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. git clone git clone You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Tried it yesterday. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. to your account, Hello It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. all give ERROR on my PC Help !!!!!!! When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. When Secure Boot is enabled, BIOS boot (CSM) should not work at all, since it would completely defeat the purpose of only allowing signed executables to boot. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. 3. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Already on GitHub? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". - . The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB to your account, Hi ! Besides, I'm considering that: If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. @ventoy unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Sign in @rderooy try to use newest version, I've been trying on a Dell XPS 13 9360 with Ventoy 1.0.34 UEFI running and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso does not work. 5. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. Some known process are as follows: The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. 4. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. privacy statement. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. V4 is legacy version. TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and All other distros can not be booted. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Not associated with Microsoft. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. Reply. The file size will be over 5 GB. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Will it boot fine? Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. to your account. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. I think it's OK. Option 2 will be the default option. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Seriously? Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. they reviewed all the source code). , Laptop based platform: Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. For these who select to bypass secure boot. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Can it boot ok? The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. I didn't try install using it though. Customizing installed software before installing LM - Linux Mint Forums Do I still need to display a warning message? UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. Win10UEFI EDIT: The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. 1. What matters is what users perceive and expect. . In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. evrything works fine with legacy mode. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" No. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. . Is there any progress about secure boot support? In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. You signed in with another tab or window. If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi It . But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. You can change the type or just delete the partition. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh I'm unable to boot my Windows 10 installer USB in UEFI mode? I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). 2. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. All the .efi files may not be booted. I'm not talking about CSM. I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. So I apologise for that. No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> da1: quirks=0x2. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. 6. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Have a question about this project? check manjaro-gnome, not working. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Edit ISO - no UEFI - forums.ventoy.net @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. You are receiving this because you commented. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? Some bioses have a bug. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. ElementaryOS boots just fine. The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something).

Bottomless Brunch Palm Springs, Articles V

ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi